Anti-crisis management as a tool of the system of regulation of economic security of business-structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2024.02.02.01Keywords:
crisis, economic security, anti-crisis management, business structure, mechanism of anti-crisis management.Abstract
The subject of the study is theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of the mechanism of anti-crisis management of business structures in the conditions of transformation of the global economic environment of their functioning. The purpose of the study is to determine the set of factors that cause a crisis situation in the activities of business structures, their ranking, and the development of proposals for the structure of the anti-crisis response mechanism in their activities. A set of methods was used in the study: general methods - synthesis, generalization, abstraction, system-structural; special economic methods - statistical and comparative analysis for assessing the level of economic efficiency of business structures. The article outlines the importance of developing theoretical approaches and practical recommendations for the formation of the structure of the anti-crisis management mechanism in the activities of business structures, since it is possible to note the lack of adaptability of developed countermeasures to modern challenges and threats, which is the reason for the emergence of a crisis situation. Based on the results of the generalizations of scientific approaches of scientists, a conceptual approach to the interpretation of this definition was formed regarding the content of the concept of "anti-crisis management". The determined principles of anti-crisis management in the activity of business structures, tasks and content served as the basis for the formation of its types, which are outlined by the conditions of operation, the field of activity, the place on the market, the production capacities of business entities and the stages of the product life cycle. On the basis of a methodical approach based on the analysis of basic and special indicators, an algorithm of the process of crisis identification in the activity of business structures was formed. The financial potential of business structures was evaluated based on the profitability of the main activity, which allows monitoring the possibility of applying the principles of anti-crisis management.
References
Chikarenko I.A. (2011). Principles and model of implementation of anti-crisis management system at the municipal level. URL: http://www.dridu.dp.ua/ vidavnictvo / 2011 / 2011_04 (11) /11ciaumr.pdf.
Durman M.O., Durman O.L. (2021). Sutnistʹ antykryzovoho upravlinnya ta pryntsypy yoho zdiysnennya. Visnyk KHNTU. № 1 (76). S. 153–161.
Informatsiinyi biuleten Derzhavnoi sluzhby statystyky. Pytoma vaha pidpryiemstv, yaki otrymaly zbytok, u zahalnii kilkosti pidpryiemstv, za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti u rozrizi rehioniv za 2014−2022 roky. URL: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Ivaniuta S.M. (2006). Antykryzove upravlinnia v ahrarnii sferi kontrolinhu: avtoref. dys. d-ra ekon. nauk: spets. 08.06.01. Ukrainska akademiia ahrarnykh nauk. 20 s.
Kholod Z.M., Shtanhret Z.M. (2002). Metodolohichni aspekty antykryzovoho upravlinnia. Ekonomika promyslovosti. № 2. S. 32–40.
Morozov Ye. Yu. (2018). Antykryzovi zakhody v systemi upravlinnya pidpryyemstvom. Derzhava ta rehiony, no. 3(102), pp. 114–120.
Piletska S. T. (2014). Antykryzove upravlinnia ekonomichnoiu stiikistiu promyslovoho aviapidpryiemstva: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury. 320 s.
Shabatura T.S. (2013). Zmitsnennia finansovoi skladovoi ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva .Oblik i finansy. №1. S. 99-105.
Shpachuk V.V. (2011). “Sutnist terminy “Antikrizove ypravlinia””, Zbirnik naykovix prats. Seria Ypravlinia, available at: http:// www.suem.edu.ua/documents/journal_2_10_2011.pdf.
Sytnyk L.S. (2000). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: monohrafiia. Donetsk: IEP NAN Ukrainy. 504 s.
Udoskonalennia diahnostyky antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom u systemi upravlinskoi diahnostyky / R. Skrynkovskyi ta in. URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6234599.pdf.
Vatchenko, B., Sharanov, R. (2022). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh viinY. Ekonomichnyi prostir, (182), 38-43. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/182-5.
Vasylchak Svitlana, Uliana Petrynyak, Marija Dubyna, Serhiy Soloviy. (2023). Tools for ensuring the competitiveness of business entities in the context of development to EU conditions. Scientific and practical journal "Economics and technical engineering". Kryvyi Rih, Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023) S. 21-32.
Vasylenko O.V. (2003). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: navch. posib. Kyiv: TsUL. 504 s
Zakharenko N.S. (2010) Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom na osnovi klasyfikatsii kryz ta faktoriv yikh vyiavlennia. Visnyk Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky. Vyp. 20. S. 60–62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.