Systemic Transition from a Linear to a Circular Model in the Context of Business Environment Transformation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2025.03.02.04

Keywords:

circular economy; green transition; global material flows; material stocks; secondary resources; sustainable business; resource efficiency; waste management; bioeconomy; digitalization.

Abstract

The study analyses structural changes in global resource use and identifies the key factors shaping the shift toward circularity under current environmental and economic pressures. Drawing on international analytical assessments and global material flow databases, the study analyses long-term trends in resource extraction, domestic material consumption and circularity indicators. The findings reveal a persistent dominance of primary material use and a decline in the global circularity rate, indicating that the expansion of primary extraction continues to outpace the development of secondary material flows. Significant regional disparities in material consumption patterns further demonstrate that the feasibility and pace of the circular transition vary substantially across world regions. The study identifies three systemic barriers constraining the shift to circularity: the underestimated potential of the bioeconomy, continued dependence on fossil fuels and the rapid accumulation of long-lived material stocks. These factors generate structural inertia that reinforces linear pathways and delays future circularity. The article shows that current business models insufficiently integrate repair, reuse, high-quality recycling and service-based value creation, which limits the formation of secondary resource markets and slows reductions in material intensity. The research also develops a structured model of government–business interaction, demonstrating that a successful circular transition requires coherent policy frameworks, international coordination, digital monitoring systems and strong corporate engagement. Key priorities include slowing the growth of material stocks, extending asset lifetimes, expanding regenerative biomass use, strengthening secondary material markets and establishing a global system for resource governance. The findings confirm that only a coordinated transformation of institutional mechanisms, economic incentives and business strategies can ensure a meaningful transition toward a circular economy and support long-term socio-ecological resilience.

References

Blomsma, F., Bauwens, T., Weissbrod, I., & Kirchherr, J. (2023). The ‘need for speed’: Towards circular disruption—What it is, how to make it happen and how to know it's happening. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1010-1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3106

Boehm, S., Jeffery, L., Hecke, J., Schumer, C., Jaeger, J., Fyson, C., ... & Daly, E. (2023). State of Climate Action 2023. World Resources Institute. Berlin and Cologne, Germany, San Francisco, CA, and Washington, DC.

Circle Economy. (2025). The Circularity Gap Report 2025: A circular economy to live within the safe limits of the planet. Circle Economy.

Di Stefano, C., Elia, S., Garrone, P., & Piscitello, L. (2023). The Circular Economy as a new production paradigm to enhance resilience of MNEs and the economic system. AIB insights, 23(3), 1-7. DOI:10.46697/001c.74163

Henriques, R., Figueiredo, F., & Nunes, J. (2023). Consumers’ Perspectives on Circular Economy: Main Tendencies for Market Valorization. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15 (19), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914292

Hushko, S., & Bay, O. (2025). ECOLOGIZATION OF INDUSTRY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EU CIRCULAR ECONOMY INDICATIVE FRAMEWORK. Sustainable Economic Development, (5 (56)), 170-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2025-56-24

Hushko, S., Kryshtopa, I., Temchenko, H., & Maksymova, I. (2018). Modelling of management activity of the organization considering the impact of implicit factors in business processes. East European Journal of Advanced Technologies, 1(3 (91)), 13-21. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.121647

International Resource Panel. (2024a). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend: Pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes. United Nations Environment Programme.

International Resource Panel. (2024b). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend: Pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes. United Nations Environment Programme.

Krysovatyy, A., Maksymova, I., Kurilyak, V., Radin, M., & Kurilyak, M. (2024). International convergence towards a climate-neutral economy: modeling the agricultural sector. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 10(2), 52-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.355962

Lukashevych, Y., Evdokimov, V., Polukhin, A., Maksymova, I., & Tsvilii, D. (2024). Innovation in the energy sector: The transition to renewable sources as a strategic step towards sustainable development. African Journal of Applied Research, 10(1), 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v10i1.665

Maksymova, I. I. (2024). The role of digitalisation in supporting global ESG initiatives: international business's transition to climate neutrality. Investments: practice and experience, (6), 103-110. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6814.2024.6.103

Mallick, P. K., Salling, K. B., Pigosso, D. C., & McAloone, T. C. (2023). Closing the loop: Establishing reverse logistics for a circular economy, a systematic review. Journal of environmental management, 328, 117017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117017

Plank, B., Streeck, J., Virag, D., Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., & Wiedenhofer, D. (2022). From resource extraction to manufacturing and construction: flows of stock-building materials in 177 countries from 1900 to 2016. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 106122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106122

Reyes-García, V., Villasante, S., Benessaiah, K., Pandit, R., Agrawal, A., Claudet, J., ... & Zinngrebe, Y. (2025). The costs of subsidies and externalities of economic activities driving nature decline. Ambio, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02147-3

Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bennndsten, J., Cornell, S., Donges, J., et al. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458

Soonsawad, N., Marcos‐Martinez, R., & Schandl, H. (2024). City‐scale assessment of the material and environmental footprint of buildings using an advanced building information model: A case study from Canberra, Australia. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 28(2), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13456

Vitunskienė, V., Aleksandravičienė, A., & Ramanauskė, N. (2022). Spatio-temporal assessment of biomass self-sufficiency in the European Union. Sustainability, 14(3), 1897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031897

Wiedenhofer, D., Baumgart, A., Matej, S., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Lanau, M., & Haberl, H. (2024). Mapping and modelling global mobility infrastructure stocks, material flows and their embodied greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139742

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

Systemic Transition from a Linear to a Circular Model in the Context of Business Environment Transformation. (2026). Economics and Technical Engineering, 4(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2025.03.02.04