Increasing the efficiency of the furnace depending on the operating conditions of the furnaces. Part 2. The technology of joint loading of lumpy anthracite and fluxed local specs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2024.02.01.09

Keywords:

pulverized coal; anthracite; sinter; pellets; fluxed local specs; coke consumption

Abstract

The article analyzes the reasons for the growing research interest in the technology of loading lump anthracite of different fractions into a blast furnace to increase its efficiency. It is shown that loading blast furnaces with additional lump anthracite can be an effective way to improve the technical and economic indicators of their operation, especially on furnaces that work without the technology of pulverized fuel injection. It was noted that the traditional directions of development of iron smelting technology in blast furnaces practically mastered. At the same time, the problem of improving the quality of iron ore raw materials has not yet been fully resolved. A conclusion was made about the need for a new type of iron ore raw material, which would combine the best properties of agglomerate and pellets and would not have their negative features. A number of technologies for the production of a new type of iron ore raw material have been developed - fluxed local specs from iron ore concentrates of various degrees of enrichment, with an increased iron content compared to agglomerate and pellets and with an increased residual carbon content. A comparison of technological parameters of production and metallurgical characteristics of agglomerate, pellets and the developed unfluxed mono-raw material was made. If two technologies are combined: loading of lump anthracite into the blast furnace for partial replacement of coke and mono-raw material, namely, local specs with a high content of iron and residual carbon, then analytical estimates show that, for example, when loading into furnace No. 9 with useful volume of 5000 m3 up to 70 kg/t of lump anthracite, blowing up to 60 m3/t of natural gas and using local specs with a residual carbon of 2.85 % and an iron content of 70.45 %, it is possible to reduce coke consumption to 322.68 kg/t of cast iron and increase furnace productivity to 12733 t/day, which can be compared with the best indicators achieved in the world when blowing PCI, but without large capital costs.

References

Amdur, A., Shibanova, M., & Ental’tsev, E. (2008). Thermal-destruction products of coal in the blast-furnace gas-purification system. Steel in Translation, 38, 844-848. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091208100136.

Cavaliere, P., & Perrone, A. (2014). Optimization of Blast Furnace Productivity Coupled with CO2 Emissions Reduction. Steel research international, 85. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201300027.

Chuprynov, Y., Kassim, D., Shmeltser, K., Liakhova, I., Renkas, O. (2023). Increasing the efficiency of the furnace depending on the operating conditions of the furnaces. Part 1. Technology of loading of lumped anthracite and natural gas injection. Economics and Technical Engineering, 1(1), 134-146. https://ete.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/83

Jianliang, Z., Kuangdi, X. (2023). Pulverized Coal Injection of Blast Furnace Ironmaking. In: Xu, K. (eds) The ECPH Encyclopedia of Mining and Metallurgy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0740-1_1047-1

Jin, L., & Niu, X. (2021). Micromorphology and safety properties of meager and meager-lean coal for blast furnace injection. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 28, 774 - 781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2104-2.

Kasai, A., Toyota, H., Nozawa, K., & Kitayama, S. (2011). Reduction of Reducing Agent Rate in Blast Furnace Operation by Carbon Composite Iron Ore Hot Briquette. Isij International, 51, 1333-1335. https://doi.org/10.2355/ISIJINTERNATIONAL.51.1333.

Kawanari, M., Matsumoto, A., Ashida, R., & Miura, K. (2011). Enhancement of Reduction Rate of Iron Ore by Utilizing Iron Ore/Carbon Composite Consisting of Fine Iron Ore Particles and Highly Thermoplastic Carbon Material. Isij International, 51, 1227-1233. https://doi.org/10.2355/ISIJINTERNATIONAL.51.1227.

Koichi, T., Nouchi, T., Sato, M., & Ariyama, T. (2015). Perspective on Progressive Development of Oxygen Blast Furnace for Energy Saving. Isij International, 55, 1866-1875. https://doi.org/10.2355/ISIJINTERNATIONAL.ISIJINT-2015-196.

Li, T., Wang, G., Zhou, H., Ning, X., & Zhang, C. (2022). Numerical Simulation Study on the Effects of Co-Injection of Pulverized Coal and Hydrochar into the Blast Furnace. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084407.

Liu, X., Chen, L., Qin, X., & Sun, F. (2015). Exergy loss minimization for a blast furnace with comparative analyses for energy flows and exergy flows. Energy, 93, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2015.09.008.

Lyalyuk, V., Tarakanov, A., Kassim, D., Listopadov, V., & Miroshnichenko, O. (2016). Technological Aspects of the Use of Lump Anthracite in Blast-Furnace Smelting. Metallurgist, 60, 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-016-0264-0.

Lyalyuk, V., Tarakanov, A., Kassim, D., Otorvin, P., & Pinchuk, D. (2017). Blast-furnace operation with pulverized-coal injection and with chunk anthracite. Steel in Translation, 47, 469-472. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091217070063.

Lyalyuk, V.P., Tarakanov, A.K., Chuprinov, E.V. et al. (2021). Possibility of Increasing the Efficiency of Blast Furnace Smelting Depending on the Operating Conditions of Blast Furnaces. Steel Transl. 51, 795–804. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091221110085

Raygan, S., Abdizadeh, H. & Eskandari Rizi, A. (2010). Evaluation of four coals for blast furnace pulverized coal injection. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 17, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60065-9

Shen, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Modelling of injecting a ternary coal blend into a model ironmaking blast furnace. Minerals Engineering, 90, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MINENG.2015.12.009.

Shengli, W., Hongliang, H., Haifa, X., Hongwei, W., & Weizhong, T. (2009). Increasing proportion of natural lump ores in blast furnace. Revue De Metallurgie-cahiers D`Informations Techniques, 106, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1051/METAL/2009028.

van Straaten, V., de Graaff, B. & Engel, E. (2019). Hot Blast System Development: Technology, Operations, Campaign Management. Berg Huettenmaenn Monatsh 164, 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-019-00916-8.

Yang, Lc., Pang, Qh., He, Zj. et al. (2021). Kinetic study on co-combustion of pulverized anthracite and bituminite for blast furnace injection. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 28, 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-021-00564-8.

Ren, S., Zhang, J., Liu, W., Su, B., Xing, X., & Bai, Y. (2013). An Integrated Evaluation System of Anthracite, Meager-lean Coal and Bituminous Coal Co-injection for a Blast Furnace. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 35, 2123 - 2131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.645995.

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

Increasing the efficiency of the furnace depending on the operating conditions of the furnaces. Part 2. The technology of joint loading of lumpy anthracite and fluxed local specs. (2024). Economics and Technical Engineering, 2(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2024.02.01.09

Most read articles by the same author(s)